Recently I reviewed the MT 100 Leather Waterproof Boots by Decathlon. This review focuses on the women’s version of the shoe, with a separate review planned for the men’s version.

I recently surveyed trekkers to find out which shoes they use. To my surprise, the majority mentioned these very shoes—the MT 100. Naturally, I was curious to understand why they were so popular. I tested them myself and compiled a list of pros and cons to help you decide whether they are worth investing in.

Pros of the MT 100 Leather Waterproof Boots

1. Excellent Grip

One of the most important aspects of a trekking shoe is grip. This shoe performs exceptionally well in that area. It comes with a ‘contact sole,’ as Decathlon calls it, and features deep lugs, deeper than those found in many other shoes. I tested them on flat boulders while trekking around Bangalore, and I felt like Spider-Man—climbing up and down effortlessly. They also perform well in the snow, making them highly reliable.

2. Cushioning and Comfort

The shoe has a thick midsole that provides excellent cushioning. A good trekking shoe should not be too hard or too soft but should maintain a balance. The MT 100 achieves this balance perfectly, offering flexibility when needed while still providing sturdy foot protection.

3. Ankle Support

Twisting an ankle is a common concern for trekkers. These shoes provide solid ankle support, thanks to their high length, which helps prevent injuries. The sturdy design ensures your ankles are well protected on uneven terrain.

4. Water Resistance

When trekking in rain, snow, or through puddles, water resistance becomes essential. Though I didn’t get a chance to test these shoes in snow myself, I consulted at least eight trek leaders who have used them extensively. They confirmed that water does not seep in through the sides or front. When paired with gaiters, these shoes offer excellent water resistance, making them ideal for wet conditions.

Cons of the MT 100 Leather Waterproof Boots

1. Potential for Blisters

Some trekkers, including myself, experienced slight blisters on the ankle area or the back of the foot after prolonged use (around 12 hours of continuous wear). This can be managed by wearing thick, high-quality sports socks that extend above the shoes. Avoid ankle-length socks, as they may not provide sufficient protection. The issue appears to be caused by a stitch running down the middle of the shoe at the back.

2. Limited Breathability

Since the shoe is made entirely of leather and designed to be highly water-resistant, it has limited breathability. While this is not a major issue in colder climates like the Himalayas, it can be uncomfortable in warmer regions, where feet may sweat excessively. Those with naturally sweaty feet may find this aspect more noticeable.

Should You Buy It?

Rent vs. Buy

My first recommendation for trekkers is to rent shoes, especially if you trek only once or twice a year. However, if you trek frequently—whether in your city or the Himalayas—investing in a personal pair of comfortable trekking shoes makes sense.

Value for Money

At ₹5,500, the MT 100 falls within the typical price range for trekking shoes (₹4,000-₹6,000). Interestingly, the women’s version is slightly less expensive than the men’s version—one of the few areas where we win! If you are a regular trekker, this is a worthy investment.

Final Verdict

The Decathlon MT 100 Leather Waterproof Boots tick all the essential boxes: grip, flexibility, ankle support, and water resistance. However, trekkers should be mindful of potential blisters and limited breathability. Overall, these are great shoes for regular trekkers who need reliable footwear for various terrains.

We will soon be comparing the MT 100 with the Trek 100, as many of you have asked about the differences.