Indiahikes_Privacy_Policy.pdf

Indiahikes_Terms_&_Conditions.pdf

Bengaluru Office

Dehradun Office

It's not a nice feeling to regret a Himalayan trek. But many trekkers go through this phase. Swathi writes about her personal regret in this post. Read on.

Why I Regret My Trek To Kedarkantha After Completing Rupin Pass

Why I Regret My Trek to Kedarkantha after Completing Rupin Pass

Click here to learn more about our school programmes

Here are the 5 best and safest Himalayan treks for children to do. All the treks are in Uttarakhand, and they make for a great experience.

5 Best Himalayan Treks for Children

5 Best and Safest Himalayan Treks for Children

This article helps you plan and rightly time the Valley of Flowers trek. This is a secret nobody tells you.

What Is The Best Time To Visit Valley of Flowers - What Nobody Tells You

The Atal Tunnel could change the future of trekking in Himachal, as it opens up some terrific trekking regions. Here's how.

How the Atal Tunnel Impacts Trekking in India

These three states are very different from each other -- the mountain ranges, the landscapes, the flora. Here's an idea of which one to choose

Why Treks in Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu &amp; Kashmir are so different

Why We Change Trekking Routes From Time To Time

Here's a collection of informative trekking articles form over the years. From the comparing treks in the Himalayas, to discovering forests in Chhattisgarh.

A Collection of 12 Trekking Articles You Must Read

Arjun Majumdar talks about the sikkim situation

The Injustice about Goechala

At 20,500 feet Stok Kangri is the highest trekkable summit in India (6,153 mts). However, this trek is not for beginners. Arjun Majumdar explains why.

Why Stok Kangri in Ladakh is meant for the experienced trekker

Why Stok Kangri in Ladakh is Meant for the Experienced Trekker

We are seeing more and more dhabas on trekking trails. Are they an eye-sore or are they a blessing? Share your thoughts in this debate!

Dhabas on Treks, Yes or No? What do you think?

In this post, we talk about 5 elements that have to come together for us to select a campsite and set up a trekking trail. Take a look!

How We Choose Campsites On Himalayan Treks

Why 2020 was a Landmark Year for Trekking in India

We never loose out on an opportunity to go on a weekend trek. Due to the COVID19 lockdown, we're all stuck. Here's what we miss the most weekend treks.

What I Miss About Weekend Treks During The COVID Lockdown

The Valley of Flowers trek is one of the most popular treks in India. If you plan to visit this trail, read this article to know what to look forward to!

What To (And Not To) Expect From The Valley of Flowers Trek

Arjun Majumdar writes about one of the best meadow treks, the Dayara Bugyal trek and highlights why it is also known as a Grand Snow Trek!

Why Dayara Bugyal Is A Grand Snow Trek For Beginners

Before she became a Trek Leader, Anuja trekked extensively across the Himalayas. Her trek to Pin Parvati shaped the course of her life. Read her story here.

What I Learnt When I Trekked With Shepherds Across Pin Parvati Pass

Trekking in Kashmir is unique in many ways but few other treks can match up to the experience of doing Tarsar Marsar trek. Here Arjun Majumdar tells us why.

Why Should Tarsar Marsar Be On Your Bucketlist?

When Sachin Jha went on the Kanamo Peak trek, he did not expect his most experienced trek leader, Saranbir Singh, to go missing. Here's what happened.

How even the most experienced trekkers can get lost in the mountains

Not many Himalayan treks are accessible in winter. Kedarkantha is a rare exception. Here is all you need to know all about this winter trek.

Your ultimate guide to the Kedarkantha Winter Trek - Sankri Route

I’ve picked up a controversial topic today (I’m wondering why I keep doing this to myself).  But I’ve been conflicted about this for a long time. 

At Indiahikes, we firmly believe that everyone must trek. Trekking transforms lives; it profoundly impacts the mind, body and spirit like nothing else can. We believe that everyone must feel that sense of transformation. So when we see more and more people trekking, it gives us a deep sense of satisfaction.

At the same time, we are extremely vehement that trekking must be sustainable, without any harm to the environment.

This is where my conflict is. Almost everyone correlates crowds to environmental harm — the more crowd there is on a trek, the more damage it does to the environment. The more it spoils the trekking experience. 

Why is there such a hue and cry about crowds? 

Well, there are two types of “crowds” on our trekking trails. 

There’s one type of trekkers, who are sensitized about the fragile ecosystem they’re trekking in. They trek minimally, respect the environment, and make little or no noise. They leave mountains better or at least leave no trace. They approach the mountains with what we call “the spirit of trekking.” In fact, the best of our trekkers are always rewarded with a Spirit of Trekking award. 

On the other hand, there’s another type of trekkers who come to the mountains with a “tourist” mindset. They play loud music, use single-use cutlery for every meal. They want the luxuries of a city in the remotest areas of the Himalayas. When there are such trekkers, even two seems like a crowd. 

This is where it bothers me when a few naysayers raise a hue and cry that Indiahikes takes too many trekkers to the mountains. They must realise that there is an unprecedented demand for trekking in our country. If Indiahikes groups are full, trekkers are forced to find another way to go. Trekking isn’t going to stop, the crowds aren’t going to reduce. When such is the case, I would rather have a larger group of sensitized trekkers than small groups of unsensitized trekkers.

There’s another sect of people that need a reality check. These are people who complain that Indiahikes charges too less and makes trekking accessible for too many people. We strongly oppose such an elitist mindset where the mountains and their beauty are reserved for those handful who can afford exorbitant amounts. We work with the vision that Everyone must trek, and they must trek with the right spirit of trekking.

That brings me to the question — are crowds the problem or is management of the crowds the problem?

Very frankly, compared to the rest of the world, India is still in a nascent stage when it comes to trekking. If you look at footfalls of popular trails around the world, the numbers climb to 1,000 – 2,500 a day, often rising to half a million hikers in a year. This is true of the famous Inca Trail in Peru, the EBC and ABC treks in Nepal. Yet, these trails are pristine, without damage to the environment. In India, an extremely popular trail like Kedarkantha may have just around 20,000 trekkers going in a year, meagre numbers in comparison to the world. 

When trekking is at such a nascent stage in our country, trekkers do not automatically come with the right mindset. 

Every day, about 70 – 75% of trekkers are stepping into the Himalayas for the very first time. They need to be taught how to be in such a fragile ecosystem. 

This is where every trekking organisation needs to address the behaviour of their trekkers. 

It’s up to each organisation to ensure that their trekkers care for the environment before they care for themselves. It’s up to the organisation to put processes in place that ensure their presence in the mountains causes no harm to the environment. It’s up to the organisation to leave mountains better.  

This is not easy. Just to instill the right mindset and behaviour among trekkers, Indiahikes has a team of nine Experience Coordinators working day and night. 

As for putting processes in place, around 15% of our income goes into bringing about sustainable practices in trekking — a huge amount for any organisation. 

Can every organisation that’s taking trekkers into the Himalayas assure that? I don’t know. It’s not practical to expect that either. 

Every trekking organisation has a strong influence over how their trekkers behave in the mountains. Yet, it isn’t easy to exercise that influence correctly. Picture by Abhijeet Karwande

What are the real solutions to manage crowds?

 Trekking as a sport and tourist activity needs recognition 

To begin with, trekking is still not a properly recognised sport or tourist activity in our country. It is often parked as a subdivision under mountaineering or “tourism.” This lack of recognition is the first impediment, which does not allow the sport to grow with the government’s involvement. 

When an activity such as trekking goes unrecognized, even its economical benefits to the state go unrecognized, which gives the government little or no incentive to invest in it and regulate it. 

When I look at the most populous trekking trails of the world (including our neighbours in Nepal), I notice that despite crowds, trekking trails are clean, well-managed, and with good infrastructure. There is a mechanism to care for the trail, to regulate the numbers, to ensure a certain discipline in trekking.

Trekking trails in Nepal are an excellent example of how the government has taken initiative to build infrastructure (tea houses such as this) and manage crowds and thereby, waste on the trails. 

The biggest difference is the involvement of the government.

In India, the government has not yet seriously stepped into the trekking world.

There is no infrastructure, there is a weak waste management system, there is little regulation. While trekking organisations as large as Indiahikes can manage these to a certain extent, it is possible only to a certain scale. Without the government’s support, it’s a losing battle. 

On the other hand, trekking regulations are still rudimentary in our country. They are often driven by reactions to sudden petitions or environmental emergencies. Many treks like Kheerganga, Stok Kangri, Kanamo Peak have been closed by such restrictions. These are strong steps that can be detrimental to the economy of the region. It is not a step forward, but a step backward. 

 We have got to stop overcrowding trails 

There is an issue of overcrowding on certain treks — Kedarkantha, Kashmir Great Lakes, Brahmatal… Every trail has a certain “ecological carrying capacity” (defined as the number of visitors or visits an area can sustain without irreversibly degrading natural resources). While these are not really researched in our country, common sense tells us that a lot of trekking trails have already reached their threshold, simply because of mismanagement of crowds. 

Until these crowds can be managed by their organisation or the government, trekkers must choose to spread out rather than head to the well-known names. 

The government has taken a good step on the Gaumukh Tapovan trail by limiting the number of trekkers per day. Similar steps have been taken on local treks (like Kumaraparvatha). But is this going to work without the other initiatives of waste management and trail discipline? I don’t think so.

At the end of the day, if you ask me, crowds are not really an issue, but management of crowds is an issue. 

If every organisation can take charge of their trekkers, better yet, take it up as a collective responsibility to collaborate and protect the environment, the entire trekking community can make a positive difference, leaving mountains better.  

If the government steps in with the required funding, manpower and infrastructure, then trekking can grow in a healthy way. State governments can reap benefits of growth in the economy brought in by trekking. Local employment can grow exponentially. 

I cannot help but end with the thought that a lot of good comes from trekking. It transforms trekker’s lives, it transforms the lives of locals. It brings about a much-required behavioural change in society’s outlook towards the environment. 

I truly hope to see a day when Indians don’t have to step out of the country to see what modern trekking looks like. We should be setting an example for the rest of the world to see and learn from.

Crowds on Treks: Are They Good or Bad?

Kedarkantha Trek

Choharnag Lakes Trek

Tarsar Marsar Trek

Bhrigu Lake Trek

Everest Base Camp (Classic Route)

Bijli Mahadev Trek

Gokarna Coastal Trek

Rupin Pass

Warwan Valley Trek

Chandrakhani Pass Trek

Brammah Valley Trek

Surya Top

Narmada Backwaters Trek

Ali Bedni Bugyal Trek 

Pangarchulla Peak Trek

Coorg Nelji Hill Trek

Kuari Pass Trek

Phulara Ridge Trek

Deoriatal Chandrashila Trek

Ranthan Kharak Trek

Channarayana Durga Weekend Trek 

Buran Ghati Trek

Gidara Bugyal

Manali Kaisdhar Trek for Beginners

Minchukallu Betta Weekend Trek

Gaumukh Tapovan Trek

Bali Pass Trek

Dayara Bugyal Trek

Chhattisgarh Jungle Trek

Kedartal Trek

Beas Kund Trek

Nag Tibba Weekend Trek

Brahmatal Trek

Pench Tiger Trail

Pin Bhaba Pass Trek

Georgia Atsunta Pass Trek

Miyar Valley

Khopra Ridge Trek

Goechala Trek

Mount Rinjani Trek

Everest Base Camp via Gokyo Ri Trek

Har Ki Dun

Kashmir Great Lakes Trek 

Gurez Valley Trek

Valley of Flowers

Nafran Valley Trek

Tulian Lake Trek

Hampta Pass Trek

Sandakphu Phalut Trek

Pir Panjal Lakes Trek 

Dayara Bugyal Summer Camp 

Odisha Debrigarh Sanctuary Trek

Bananthimari Betta Trek

Goa Netravali Forest Trek

Kedarkantha Summer Camp Trek

Kuari Pass Summer Camp Trek

Kodaikanal Avocado Hill Trek

Aancha Top Trek

Mural Danda Exploration

Roopkund Trek

arnamalai trek

Deoban Weekend Trek

Vellore Amirthi Forest Trek

Annapurna Base Camp Trek

Bodpathri Trek

Winter Trekking Camp for Children

Youth Camp on Ali Bedni Bugyal

Benog Tibba Family Trek

Kanamo Peak Trek

Dafeybhir Pass Trek

Biligundlu Cauvery River Trek

Ghepan Lake

Mount Kilimanjaro Trek

Chirbatiya Weekend Trek

Benog Tibba Trek

Ala-Kul Trek - Kyrgyzstan

Gutirayan Peak Trek

Valle Malai Trek

Bidirukatte Trek

Pyramid Hills Trek

Koilkonda Fort Trek

Ramdevarabetta Trek

Sathuragiri Hill Trek

Ettina Bhuja Trek

Musattu Hill Trek

Parvathamalai Trek

Satpura Forest Trail

Athri Hill Trek

Nandi Hills Trek

Handi Gundi Trek

Kumara Parvatha Trek

Nishani Motte Trek

Kugti Pass Trek

Karnala Fort Trek

Kamalgad Trek

Horagina Betta Trek

Chadar Trek

Arshan Valley Trek

Makalidurga Trek

For a long time now, there’s been a lot of hue and cry about the idea of fixed camps — the idea of camping at the same location for a longer period. I’ve been seeing other organisations targeting Indiahikes, posting pictures of our campsites, maligning our Green Trails work — all in the name of fixed camps. 

It has escalated to such an extent that the term “fixed camp” has almost become a bad word. It is now immediately associated with damage to the environment. It is considered inferior to “rolling camps” or “rotating camps” where organisations camp, pack up, leave and move to the next camp, until the next team comes. 

This idea baffles me to no end. When every ecologically evolved country of the world has adapted fixed camps as a norm, it surprises me that educated organisations in India are still debating the idea. 

What bothers me more is the lack of any logical backing in their argument. I don’t see numbers, I don’t see research. If there was any science behind it, Indiahikes would be the first to learn from it and adapt it. 

So today, after many months of deliberation, I’m going to address this topic, and go against every vehement proponent of “rolling camps” / “rotating camps.” I am going to debate you why fixed camp is infinitely better for the environment. 

I’m sharing our years of research and study on this topic. 

Important note: In this post, I’m not addressing solo trekkers or small groups of trekkers. This is meant for meant for organisations that have 3 or more groups a week, whether in the Himalayas or anywhere else in the world.

1. Fixed camping dramatically reduces the trample effect on trekking trails

This point requires a slightly deeper understanding of what “trample effect” means and why it matters.

When a trekking team of 15-20 members has to camp, it involves a whole lot of resources — tents, sleeping bags, safety equipment, snow equipment, toilet equipment, kitchen and dining equipment. Add to it food and provisions. All these have to be moved from one camp to another, usually on mules, occasionally with porters. This movement of people, equipment, provisions and mules causes something known as a “trample effect” on trails.  

This trampling of trails leaves behind an impact. It erodes away precious topsoil, which contains most of the ground’s nutrients and fertility. It bruises or shears off plants. It also compacts the soil, which doesn’t bode well for any greenery. 

 The effect is evident when you study the numbers. Consider this. 

For every team of 25 (including staff members), our gear weighs around 600 kilos for a 4-day trek. This is loaded onto mules. For a load of 600 kg, we usually have 12 mules on the trail, each carrying roughly 50 kg. 

While this doesn’t seem like much weight, here are the numbers that matter. 

Each mule, on its own, weighs around 350 kg. This is the lower average. With another 50 kilos of load, each 400 kg mule heads out on trails. 12 such mules of 400 kg walk one after the other with metal hooves on trails. 

While even humans have a small trample effect, it isn’t as heavy as a pack animal. You can read more about it in this research paper (point 6).  

So when you’re constantly pitching camps and moving to the next, taking all the equipment with you, you’re taking 12 mules of 400 kg each time, trampling trails again and again. 

Additionally, mules also consume vegetation from the trail as fodder. They eat grass, flowers and vegetation they need to stay alive. This can be quite a bit, when you consider 12 mules doing it day after day. 

Our thoughts and voices

READ MORE

ABOUT TREKS

READ MORE

Treks by Categories

Treks by Month

Treks by Difficulty

Treks by Experience

Treks by Season

Treks by Duration

Treks by Region

Quick Links

Follow Us On

Contact Us

Bengaluru Office

Dehradun Office